Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting the restoration of a deleted article.
This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.
Instructions for special cases:
- G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
- For JavaScript .js or .css pages, please request on the Wikipedia:Interface administrators' noticeboard.
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Draft:Ora Brown
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. I know thisbhas been restored previously. I am going to see if User:4meter4 can help and consider merging to Paramount Records or another entry if she can't stand alone. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Concordia Historic District
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Suren Rajendran
[edit]Hi, I'm AmirthaSund, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. AmirthaSund (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @AmirthaSund: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:National Community Pharmacists Association
[edit]- Draft:National Community Pharmacists Association · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Thriley: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Frederick Du Rietz
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2600:1700:8CA0:A150:808:8F38:A953:55D1 (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:FunyP
[edit]Hi, I'm Look4milk2024, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Look4milk2024 (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Look4milk2024: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Marley (company)
[edit]Hi, I'm Alex Gill Marley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Alex Gill Marley (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. @Alex Gill Marley: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
AVL List
[edit]Hi, I'm Cl3phact0, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- PS: Please see (User talk:Cl3phact0#Subject: Request to Consider Creating an Article for "AVL List"). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVL (engineering company), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. and AVL List was just a redirect.
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. see Draft:AVL List @Cl3phact0: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm a tad confused by the contradictory replies above: (
Not done
followed byDone
). The two drafts mentioned are clearly about the same subject (wikidata:Q300157, which is a pretty large engineering/tech company that has been around since that late 1940s). I would think we would want the article on enwiki. Is there something I'm missing? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)- @Cl3phact0: The "Not done" was for your request as written, which was for the article on the company. That article was deleted via AFD and so is not eligible for restoration via this process, as the notice clearly indicates. However, Graeme dug deeper and found there was a draft of an article for the same company and has courteously restored that for you. You may work on that draft. You will have to ensure that whatever problems the original article had are not present in the draft before you submit it for review. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, UtherSRG. I was responding to a direct AFC type request on my Talk page (per PS above). The CSD G13 deleted draft was automatically flagged when I tried to make a new one of the same name. I had not seen the related AFD draft.
Also, for what it's worth, I'm not overly interested in the subject, although, from my point of view, we should have on an AVL article on enwiki. Hopeful that @NorbertAdam1980 will do the bulk of the drafting, leaving it for non-COIs (e.g., myself, or perhaps @Schnitzelking) to tidy and publish a clean, compliant article. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, UtherSRG. I was responding to a direct AFC type request on my Talk page (per PS above). The CSD G13 deleted draft was automatically flagged when I tried to make a new one of the same name. I had not seen the related AFD draft.
- @Cl3phact0: The "Not done" was for your request as written, which was for the article on the company. That article was deleted via AFD and so is not eligible for restoration via this process, as the notice clearly indicates. However, Graeme dug deeper and found there was a draft of an article for the same company and has courteously restored that for you. You may work on that draft. You will have to ensure that whatever problems the original article had are not present in the draft before you submit it for review. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm a tad confused by the contradictory replies above: (
Draft:Harold Rossiter Music Company
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. @FloridaArmy: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
Draft:Liquid Football
[edit]Hi, I'm Mhcbeirut, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Mhcbeirut (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Mhcbeirut: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
ColorPlus (brand)
[edit]I started working on the article about 1 hour ago and I was adding the references which makes it notable. But in no time this page was deleted. I was not given the chance to defend it, which is the right of every Wikipedia editor. Please restore this article I want to work on it. Once I complete the article and references, then you have a right to take it to Afd and then a decision will be taken. —Behappyyar (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done - G11-deleted pages are not restored here. I see that you have already approached the deleting admin for restoration. Jay 💬 15:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- You can draft a replacement at Draft:ColorPlus. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mitch Guthrie
[edit]Hi, I'm Tg016, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. The article on the person in question has become significantly relevant in recent times and could be used as an addition to Wikipedia's vast archive of knowledge. Thank you. Tg016 (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Jay 💬 15:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Talk:CleanMyMac
[edit]Undelete talk page following recreation of CleanMyMac. —GTrang (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:The Real Khabar
[edit]Hi, I'm Sharmaranjeetjournalist, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Sharmaranjeetjournalist (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sharmaranjeetjournalist: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 19:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Frank R. Kardes
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 129.59.122.76 (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Huntsville City Hall
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
User:DavidRixon
[edit]Its because ive edited it and put changes and put credible source references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidRixon (talk • contribs) 20:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @DavidRixon: Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. UtherSRG (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Stacy Marking
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. UtherSRG (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Huntington Daly
[edit]Hi, I'm Joefallows1981, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Joefallows1981 (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Joefallows1981: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 02:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Pilar Winter Hill
[edit]Hi, I'm Cyberwon9348, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Cyberwon9348 (talk) 02:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done history restored, @Cyberwon9348: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
b:WB:UT. Please do not userfy the page; instead, undelete it in place, use Special:Export, delete the page again, and email me the XML file you get. —JJPMaster (she/they) 04:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- And make sure to uncheck "Include only the current revision, not the full history." JJPMaster (she/they) 05:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- The most recent revision is an RFD notice with #REDIRECT [[Optimal solutions for Rubik's Cube]]. Do you want version for 7 July 2005 and prior (prior to AFD)? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note to undeleter: Only revisions prior to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to solve the Rubik's Cube need to be restored. After it was moved to wikibooks, an IP editor re-created the page which was immediately deleted, and another editor re-created it as a redirect which was deleted 10 years later at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 26#How to solve the Rubiks Cube. Jay 💬 10:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: This is correct. JJPMaster (she/they) 11:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done and emailed. The downside of this request form is that the number of admin watchers here who also are familiar with exporting is low so they tend to languish. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery: Should I do what seems unusually common and use User talk:Graham87 as a glorified importers' noticeboard? JJPMaster (she/they) 02:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have that page watchlisted too and not this one, but that doesn't feel right either since Graham87 couldn't have done anything about this, not being an admin anymore. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery: Should I do what seems unusually common and use User talk:Graham87 as a glorified importers' noticeboard? JJPMaster (she/they) 02:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done and emailed. The downside of this request form is that the number of admin watchers here who also are familiar with exporting is low so they tend to languish. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: This is correct. JJPMaster (she/they) 11:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Sarpatta Parambarai (soundtrack)
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 223.178.82.232 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
Koushik Ghosh (mathematician)
[edit]The reason is that the professor has more than 700 citations and has impacted a lot in his research field. I have edited those things in his publication sections. —Hypothetical Painter (talk) 06:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Article has never been deleted. DMacks (talk) 06:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Alex Yakovlev
[edit]Hi, I'm Thealik, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thealik (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Thealik: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
List of vessels of Royal Navy Coastal Forces
[edit]- Draft:List of vessels of Royal Navy Coastal Forces · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm GraemeLeggett, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. @GraemeLeggett: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)- Thank you. It's something that I've been working on intermittently and when it's slipped my mind, I've had reminders but this time while i was editing less I didn't get one, or missed it, before it was removed. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
Vallabhaneni Maheedhar
[edit]Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vallabhaneni Maheedhar. It is a Genuine article —Maheeneni (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request. @Maheeneni: if you don't supply references this will be deleted again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
MONASIA
[edit]At my sandbox I added sources from different counries press. I think, now this article meets notability criteria. I found 2 article about this organisation directly and 2 mnetioned it. Please restore the erticle if possible. Nonster Ice (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC) —Nonster Ice (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done @Nonster Ice: as your sandbox looks just the same as the deleted article. That was deleted with the A7 criterion, so we can't reverse that here, and if you put your sandbox back in as an article you can expect the same fate. Ask the deleting admin, user:Bbb23 if you think they made a mistake. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Wellbeing Research Centre
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 51.191.207.113 (talk) 09:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Rtaf gripen.jpg
[edit]Request file back for edit and reupload —Fuws260 (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:The Bylines Network
[edit]Hi, I'm JulSo95, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! JulSo95 (talk) 14:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @JulSo95: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Community Advocate
[edit]Hi, I'm Bperu, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Bperu (talk) 14:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Bperu: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Amjad Masad
[edit]Hi, I'm Cosmic6811, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! A new page was recently created at the same title and I'm requesting the original. — Cosmic6811 T/C 19:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Cosmic6811: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
User:VancityRothaug
[edit]I had requested the deletion of my user page due to an account rename however that has now been reversed and would like the U1 page deletion to be reversed as well. —VancityRothaug (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:The Devil's Mistress (1965 film)
[edit]Hi, I'm EnDeeDoubleYou, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. EnDeeDoubleYou (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @EnDeeDoubleYou: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Icewhiz-sock G5s
[edit]I can't really evaluate notability from the creation logs (I'm basing off the hewiki and assuming they are comparable), but I would like to 'take over' the following articles created by Galamore:
- Ariel Movement (hewiki: אריאל (תנועת נוער))
- Weizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences (he:רס_ויצמן_למחקרים_במדעים_מדויקים)
- Haifa Zoo (he:גן_החיות_הלימודי_חיפה)
- 2016 Counter-Terrorism Law (he:חוק_המאבק_בטרור)
JayCubby 23:42, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Meitetsu 3400 series
[edit]Hi, I'm AlphaBetaGamma, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. This article is a FA in jawiki, and this is the last missing Meitetsu rolling stock article we have. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @AlphaBetaGamma: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. UtherSRG (talk) 02:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @UtherSRG (Already started a fresh clean one with the sources planned to be transferred later when the translation of prose ends, but figured I'll just ask this) Wait, old drafts can't be retrieved even if it's not my fault other editors broke promises?
- Also, is it possible for me to have a copy of the speedied version, if possible? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 14:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Old drafts can certainly be retrieved. However, when you request and get a draft restored, then don't touch it for six months, and it gets deleted again, and then you again request restoration, we are going to ask, as I did, if you are ready to immediately start working on it. As, again,
Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace.
Repeated restorations without any work on them, is counter to this. So, do you still wish the draft restored? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)- I'm not sure how much work was even put on the draft before it was speedy deleted (not sure if anything in the old version can be used or not, but I'm still curious to check it), so @UtherSRG, could I have a restored version at Draft:Meitetsu 3400 series (old) or is there a technical limitation to doing this? In the meantime I'm going to work on the new draft. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'll restore it in place. You will be able to see the content in the draft's edit history. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how much work was even put on the draft before it was speedy deleted (not sure if anything in the old version can be used or not, but I'm still curious to check it), so @UtherSRG, could I have a restored version at Draft:Meitetsu 3400 series (old) or is there a technical limitation to doing this? In the meantime I'm going to work on the new draft. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Old drafts can certainly be retrieved. However, when you request and get a draft restored, then don't touch it for six months, and it gets deleted again, and then you again request restoration, we are going to ask, as I did, if you are ready to immediately start working on it. As, again,
- @AlphaBetaGamma: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Joe Rosenstein
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2600:4041:4527:FD00:F494:49F0:783F:C535 (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG (talk) 02:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Vinay Kumar Srivastava
[edit]Hi, I'm Msikdar, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Msikdar (talk) 03:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. @Msikdar: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:International San Francisco SC
[edit]Hi, I'm Optoneer, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. The draft in question is now in a position to include more reliable and relevant sources that can support the basis for significance. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Optoneer (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Optoneer: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Irene Lilienheim Angelico on location in the Negev filming Reaching for Zion.jpg
[edit]- File:Irene Lilienheim Angelico on location in the Negev filming Reaching for Zion.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
ticket:2024122410006211 —Krd 13:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Union of European Federalists
[edit]Please revundel per ticket:2025011710007056 —Krd 15:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Weda Bay
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. UtherSRG (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Daniel W. Crofts
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. UtherSRG (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Ina Hayward
[edit]Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. UtherSRG (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Enex Technologies
[edit]Hi, I'm Darnathiss, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Darnathiss (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Darnathiss: it seems you've recreated the draft already. Do you still need the deleted draft restored, is there something in it you want to use? Or is this undeletion request redundant now? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I thought it was requested to recreate a draft. Of course if possible I would like to restore the old draft. Thanks. Darnathiss (talk) 07:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Mir Dad Khan
[edit]Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Dad Khan. I have been rewriting the article and have found relevant sources that support its content. Therefore, I believe the article should be reinstated so I can publish my work. I am almost done and will need at least one or two more weeks to complete it. —WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @WikiEnthusiast1001: Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
- However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Mir Dad Khan. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
File:WVTV logo.svg
[edit]Not believed to be non-free; restore previous versions to facilitate transfer to Commons —Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
File:WCGV logo 2006-2018.webp
[edit]Not believed to be non-free; restore previous versions to facilitate transfer to Commons —Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Brian Thompson (businessman)
[edit]Hi, I'm Utopes, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Thank you.
(TIL that the draft was deleted less than a week before he died). Now that the page has been redirected (no dedicated article in mainspace w/ this title) I think it would be useful to have the old history visible to be workable with in draftspace. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Utopes: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Percy the Small Engine
[edit]Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:F1A3:81DD:D733:B4E1 (talk) 07:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
Draft:Habibullah Badsha
[edit]Hi, I'm Hmb1234, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Hmb1234 (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Hmb1234: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:
{{subst:submit}}
. UtherSRG (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Steven Crossin/TemplateSandbox2
[edit]Used by me in my user space - I’d need the full revision history restored. There’s a Wikipedia namespace old page I’m working on that references this and for the life of me I can’t remember what was there! —Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 14:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Steven Crossin: Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist.
- Restored via discord request already. Please only ask there or here. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hadn’t seen a response there at the time, appreciated! Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 21:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Dean Odle
[edit]Hi, I'm Cradon9, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Cradon9 (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Cradon9: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Jan Dalhuisen
[edit]Hi, I'm TomBTomB, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. TomBTomB (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TomBTomB: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:International non-use agreement on solar geoengineering
[edit]- Draft:International non-use agreement on solar geoengineering · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I'm Clayoquot, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Another editor copied text from this page to mainspace in this edit so attribution history needs to be repaired. I think I can do that after the draft is undeleted. Thank you. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 18:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Clayoquot: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 19:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. @BD2412 . Since you now know the context, could you please consider moving the page and its talk page to International non-use agreement on solar geoengineering, which is currently a redirect? This would solve the attribution problem tidily. I could ask at WP:RM but since you know the context of what I'm trying to do I thought of asking you first. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 19:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Clayoquot: Done. BD2412 T 20:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Clayoquot: Done. BD2412 T 20:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. @BD2412 . Since you now know the context, could you please consider moving the page and its talk page to International non-use agreement on solar geoengineering, which is currently a redirect? This would solve the attribution problem tidily. I could ask at WP:RM but since you know the context of what I'm trying to do I thought of asking you first. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 19:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Przemysław Anders
[edit]Hi, I'm MaciejAnders, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MaciejAnders (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @MaciejAnders: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 19:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:James Coviello
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 20:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Marty (robot)
[edit]Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412 T 20:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Ching Tsang
[edit]Hi, I'm Roger Wood, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Roger Wood (talk) 20:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Roger Wood: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412 T 20:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Jamie Forbes
[edit]Hi, I'm Woso10, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Woso10 (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Woso10: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society
[edit]- Draft:San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I may continue to make edits to it. Thank you. 76.132.231.72 (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Per Villand
[edit]This page was deleted, on the second attempt, in 2018, based on a "consensus" of two respondents. The subject exists in search results, on several pages, but both Google and DDG attempt to direct the search to a Wikipedia article which has been deleted. I see no particular reason for deleting, except an exclusionist philosophy; we (quite literally) debated inclusion versus exclusion when I was a child, and I am now grey in the beard. I am beyond frustrated not to be able to review the original content to decide for myself if it should have been deleted. The result of a two person AfD should be "no consensus," not "delete." —Moralis (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done - Requests for Undeletion is for uncontroversial deletions only, whereas this article went through AfD twice. The deleted content could be emailed to you, but you would need to associate an email address to your wikipedia user account. About your argument of consensus needing to have a minimum number of participants, you could take it up at WP:Deletion review, but you may want to talk to the deleting admin Randykitty first. Jay 💬 07:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Eddie Shipstad
[edit]Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 07:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Doc Melton
[edit]Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:W. E. 'Pete' Snelson
[edit]Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 08:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:George F. Guy
[edit]Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 08:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Irving Elinson
[edit]Hi, I'm MoviesandTelevisionFan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 08:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Mena Gurjari (Play)
[edit]Hi, I'm Snehrashmi, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Snehrashmi (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Era Tak
[edit]Hi, I'm Thevikastanwar, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thevikastanwar (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Jay 💬 08:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Jack Mallers
[edit]Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Mallers BuySomeApples argued the deletion based on the fact that Jack Mallers would only have one relevant source namely Forbes Magazine. However I am still working on the article and I was just about to add these 4 notable references that all explicitly address Mallers' role in the historical developments when El Salvador became the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender:
Despite his very tender age Jack Mallers definitely earned his place in the history books and on Wikipedia.
As you can see with my previous article about Saifedean Ammous, I am making a serious effort to represent the Bitcoin space on Wikipedia in an objective fashion. Given the current further adoption of Bitcoin and crypto in the USA this space warrants good coverage. I know the rules for notoriety very well and only work on pages that for 100% sure need to be on Wikipedia. Feedback from the Bitcoin community is very welcome since I'm learning every day. Senseless deletions are counter productive.
So in that sense good that a soft deletion has been chosen. Please restore the page and let me add further sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hajosmit (talk • contribs) 09:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Hajosmit: given that this was a soft deletion, we can refund the content into the draft space, but IMO you should then put this through AfC review rather than publishing directly, because the sources do not establish notability as you seem to think (assuming that's what you mean by "notoriety"?). Based on a cursory glance at Saifedean Ammous, the same may be true there as well. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- OK that's fine. And after improving the article in the draft area, which steps are needed to get it published?
- PS What you say about Saifedean Ammous is really "out of line". His book "The Bitcoin Standard" got a separate article by somebody else. Ammous is a world renowned academic specialising in Austrian economics and author of the most influential book on Bitcoin. He is widely quoted. And operates one of the most influential podcasts on the subject as well. It is literally ridiculous to suggest that Ammous wouldn't deserve a Wikipedia page. If that's the case we can start purging half of Wikipedia. You feedback is appreciated of course. Hajosmit (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Hajosmit: okay, I've restored this to Draft:Jack Mallers, and added a submission template for you to send it to AfC whenever you're done editing it.
- What I say about notability is not out of line, it is very much in line with our notability guidelines, which are available for you to review at WP:N should you feel the need to do so. I haven't done anything to draftify or delete that Ammous article, for now at least, although I can't of course promise that another new page patroller won't do something. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have studied WP:N very well already many times and I still don't see your point with Ammous. It's much appreciated that you do not take any action here yourself (which in may opinion would amount to Wikipedia vandalism by the way). Could you be more specific than just refer to WP:N. Because I presume you must have one or two specific points where you find the article(s) lacking. I'd like to learn from your insights. Thanks in advance. Hajosmit (talk) 13:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Jack Mallers. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hajosmit (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Domenico Italo Composto-Hart
[edit]Hi, I'm TheLegacyCycle, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. TheLegacyCycle (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TheLegacyCycle: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Draft:K.M. Azam
[edit]Hi, I'm Poloplayers, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Poloplayers (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Horae Beatae Mariae Virginis (Rps BOZ 44)
[edit]Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horae Beatae Mariae Virginis (Rps BOZ 44). This was a really poor nomination by User:PARAKANYAA, who really ought to know better. It was notified to the wrong projects and not notified to the right ones! The wrong ones are Literature and Christianity, neither needed or likely to be interested, while it should have gone to Visual arts and Middle Ages. This is the standard title for a Book of hours (rather like The Bible) so of course "There appear to be several other items with the same name" - it was the most common type of late medieval manuscript. If there are other sources, they probably won't use this cataloguer's title. Unsurprisingly, no one turned up at the Afd. It may or not be notable, but the deletion needs to re-run properly. I only saw this by chance - User:PARAKANYAA, do you do lots of these? —Johnbod (talk) 19:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)